Archives by date

You are browsing the site archives by date.

The Young Mario Tronti

The Young Mario Tronti

The rela­tion­ship between Anto­nio Gram­sci and operais­mo, if occa­sion­al­ly men­tioned, is rarely expli­cat­ed. And if trans­la­tions of Tronti’s 1960s writ­ings have appeared in frag­ments, his pri­or for­ma­tion has remained almost entire­ly obscured. These texts pro­vide the read­er with not only some of the ideas per­co­lat­ing in the mind of the young Tron­ti, but also a win­dow into the pre­his­to­ry of work­erism: the tumul­tuous debates with­in the Ital­ian left of the 1950s over the mean­ings of Marx­ism.

Some Questions around Gramsci’s Marxism (1958)

Some Questions around Gramsci’s Marxism (1958)

Cer­tain­ly we must assert the nov­el­ty, the orig­i­nal­i­ty, the auton­o­my of Marx­ism. But the nov­el­ty of Marx­ism against any oth­er phi­los­o­phy con­sists not in ask­ing more of it as a phi­los­o­phy; its orig­i­nal­i­ty con­sists in its offer of sci­ence to phi­los­o­phy, or rather in its con­ceiv­ing the prop­er phi­los­o­phy only as sci­ence, as a “spe­cif­ic con­cep­tion of a spe­cif­ic object.”

On Marxism and Sociology (1959)

On Marxism and Sociology (1959)

One absolute­ly can­not accept that there exists a researcher who offers mate­r­i­al to the the­o­rist, and then there is a the­o­rist who re-elab­o­rates it and pro­duces the­o­ry. Rather, there is a con­tin­u­ous uni­ty real­ized already with­in Marx­ism, and it lives pre­cise­ly in the per­son of the Marx­ist.

A Living Unity in the Marxist: Introduction to Tronti’s Early Writings

A Living Unity in the Marxist: Introduction to Tronti’s Early Writings

Ulti­mate­ly the young Tron­ti deter­mines that what is need­ed now is a Marx­ism as far from phi­los­o­phy of prax­is as from dialec­ti­cal mate­ri­al­ism, nei­ther a sub­jec­tivist vol­un­tarism nor an objec­tivist fatal­ism, nei­ther a pure­ly tech­ni­cal method­ol­o­gy of knowl­edge and human action nor a total­iz­ing meta­physic, but a Marx­ism that is rig­or­ous but not dog­mat­ic, his­tor­i­cal yet not his­tori­cist, polit­i­cal as well as the­o­ret­i­cal.

Between Dialectical Materialism and Philosophy of Praxis: Gramsci and Labriola (1959)

Between Dialectical Materialism and Philosophy of Praxis: Gramsci and Labriola (1959)

First one has all of Marx revolve around Hegel, then one removes Hegel from the cen­ter and says: see, Marx fails to rotate on his own. This is how the inter­pre­ta­tion of a the­o­ry coin­cides with its liq­ui­da­tion. In fact pre­cise­ly this mis­un­der­stand­ing has dri­ven Marx’s thought to the mar­gins of con­tem­po­rary philo­soph­i­cal thought.